| Author |
Message |
topgoose
Joined: 22 Jan 2013
Posts: 920
Location: UK
|
 Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2015 18:03 Post subject: 64GB SDXC 45 3e 9b 92 Monolith - Config
|
|
|
I have a 64GB SDXC Monolith with an id 45 3e 9b 92 that uses the normal 14_2024_230 layout. Please can you create a config for it.
|
|
|
Сергей
Joined: 26 Aug 2005
Posts: 20281
Flash-Extractor developer
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2015 2:10 Post subject:
|
|
I'm sorry
I do not create config for monolith chips
|
|
|
AlexT
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Posts: 441
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2015 19:33 Post subject:
|
|
Sorry to butt in.. I was helping Topgoose out with this and it's not the 'normal' 64/32GB SanDisk layout issue. What prompted me to check this out for him was that the part number(23305 064G) was much higher than the other cases I've seen. 
I dumped this using a test config I put together and was surprised to see that this actually used the normal '14_2048_230' layout, no Xor issues or anything like the other cases! The mix wasn't too bad either, similar to newer USB's, and with the attached job file I was able to get ~1800 good jpegs!
I just figured he should post this so you could confirm I didn't screw up the Skip Page/Masks and possibly add it to NR/FE. 
|
|
|
Сергей
Joined: 26 Aug 2005
Posts: 20281
Flash-Extractor developer
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2015 5:27 Post subject:
|
|
Super
It is very hard to create correct config for SanDisk Monolith
Usualy i lost 2-3 days and finily i'm not sure that config is correct
|
|
|
AlexT
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Posts: 441
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2015 21:47 Post subject:
|
|
Definitely understand that. So many variables and in the end you don't even know if the data you are reading is 'good' anyways.. 
That's why I wanted him to post this one since it's actually relatively straightforward. First time I've seen a * * 9b 92 chip that was 'normal'. 
|
|
|
Сергей
Joined: 26 Aug 2005
Posts: 20281
Flash-Extractor developer
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 2:17 Post subject:
|
|
|
|
