Flash Extractor
© Soft-Center
About     Shop     Downloads     Manual     Library     Forum     Services     Contacts
i5-680 vs i7-4790k   Search  Register  Log in
Reply to topic
Author Message
Сергей



Joined: 26 Aug 2005
Posts: 19462

Flash-Extractor developer

PostPosted: Wed Mar 30, 2016 22:24    Post subject: i5-680 vs i7-4790k
Reply with quote

i5-680
http://ark.intel.com/ru/products/48504/Intel-Core-i5-680-Processor-4M-Cache-3_60-GHz
Cache 4 MB
DMI (internal bus) 2.5 GT/s
2 cores + HT (Hyper-Threading)
Freq 3.6 GHz
Turbo Boost 3.86 GHz
DDR3 1333 (I take memory with latency = 9)
Max Memory Bandwidth 21 GB/s

i7-4790K
http://ark.intel.com/ru/products/80807/Intel-Core-i7-4790K-Processor-8M-Cache-up-to-4_40-GHz
Cache 8 MB
DMI2 (internal bus) 5 GT/s
Cores 4 + HT
Freq 4 GHz
Turbo Boost 4.4 GHz
DDR3-1600 (I take memory with latency = 9)
Max Memory Bandwidth 25,6 GB/s

Test 1 - FE compile time
1 thread, many small files used
i5-680   HT on  - 96 sec 
i5-680 HT off - 91 sec
i7-4790K HT On - 61 sec
i7-4790K HT Off - 60 sec


Test 2 - ECC correction
Used same 16 GB dump
Red with ECC = Check, and green with ECC = ON
Threads number set in FE props before test
i5-680   HT on   Threads 4 -  51 min
i5-680 HT on Threads 3 - 57 min
i5-680 HT on Threads 2 - 71 min
i5-680 HT on Threads 1 - 105 min
 
i5-680 HT off Threads 2 - 62 min
i5-680 HT off Threads 1 - 102 min
 
i7-4790K HT On Threads 8 - 21 min (20:51)
i7-4790K HT On Threads 7 - 21 min (21:26)
i7-4790K HT On Threads 6 - 21 min
i7-4790K HT On Threads 5 - 22 min
i7-4790K HT On Threads 4 - 25 min
i7-4790K HT On Threads 3 - 26 min
i7-4790K HT On Threads 2 - 34 min
i7-4790K HT On Threads 1 - 60 min
 
i7-4790K HT Off Threads 4 - 21 min (21:48)
i7-4790K HT Off Threads 3 - 25 min
i7-4790K HT Off Threads 2 - 34 min
i7-4790K HT Off Threads 1 - 59 min


Results
Test 1: new processor is faster on 1.5 times
Test 2: on 1.78 with single core, and 1.82 with two cores

That is strange because 4.4 GHz / 3.86 GHz = 1,14

May be memory changed from DDR3-1333 to DDR3-1666 with same latance 9 in clock cycles.
9/1333 = 0,00675
9/1666 = 0,00540
0,00675 / 0,00540 = 1,25

We sum 1.14 from freq and 1.25 from memory = 1.14 * 1.25 = 1,425
For Test_1 result is near

What i miss?
Why results for Test_2 is 1.8 faster?
javing



Joined: 22 Sep 2015
Posts: 213


PostPosted: Fri Sep 30, 2016 15:33    Post subject:
Reply with quote

If you can use the GPU just fine.
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic All times are GMT + 4 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 

Last added
IS916EN   98 d7 98 92   1x1   v2 Monolith USB_107   ec 1e 98 3f   2x2 CBM2199   2c 84 64 3c   1x1 Monolith USB_106   45 3c 98 b3   1x2   Ref SM321QF-CC   2c d5 94 3e   1x1 AU6980   ec d3 55 25   1x1 AU6983   2c d5 94 3e   4x1 AU6384   ec da 80 15   1x1 AU6980   ad dc 80 95   1x2 AU6981   2c dc 90 95   1x1
News
11.11.2021 Legs for NR
16.08.2021 Sector Number Slow
15.07.2021 New drivers
21.05.2021 BGA-152 18x12 (smaller)
09.05.2021 Make FAT32 Root
Other products
© Soft-Center ltd.